9/17/2023 0 Comments Genitive latin endings![]() ![]() In the paradigm built on this principle, the cases marked with the same endings necessarily take adjacent positions. The syncretism is treated as a systemic phenomenon of morpheme neutralization rather than a result of phonetic reduction. The authors develop the idea that the crucial role in structuring a case paradigm belongs to morphemic syncretism. The article attempts, firstly, to critically analyze the traditional order of cases in Latin, secondly, to discover an internal mechanism that brings the elements of a paradigm together, and thirdly, to present a new model of the nominal and pronominal case paradigms in Latin. Latin Case System: Towards a Motivated Paradigmatic Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation citation: Zheltova E. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation the Great Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography (Kunstkamera),ģ, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation Ju. Towards a Motivated Paradigmatic Structureħ-9, Universitetskaya nab., St. The approach suggested in this study makes it possible to present in a new way the nominal and pronominal case paradigms, to demonstrate in what points they differ from each other, and to highlight some functional and semantic features of the particular cases. Such transparadigmatic syncretism brings together the paradigms of personal and possessive pronouns, which are related by nature. The genitive case appears in three different forms that originate from the possessive pronouns and correspond to the three basic functions of the genitive - possessive, objective, and partitive ones. The pronominal nominative’s special status is determined by its pragmatic rather than syntactic functions, which is typical for pro-drop languages. ![]() Applied to the pronominal cases, however, it reveals the significant discrepancy between the nominal and pronominal paradigms concerning two cases - nominative and genitive. This method enables authors to find the non-contradictory paradigmatic positions for both the core and the “marginal” cases (vocative and locative). Taking this as reference point, the authors establish a formally motivated paradigmatic order of cases and single out a set of semantic features that shape the case paradigm. There is a certain correlation between the morphemic syncretism and the semantics of cases extensively exemplified in the Latin literature. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |